Latvian firm wins a trademark infringement lawsuit

In May 2021 a Latvian company SIA Salmo filed a lawsuit with Bashkortostan Commercial Court against a sole entrepreneur Alesia Mitrofanova, requesting a compensation of 50 thousand rubles for infringement of its Cobra trademark, protected in Russia by virtue of international registration 771365 (in classes 22 and 28 of the Nice classification). As followed from the lawsuit, the defendant engaged in sales of counterfeit fishing wires, which fact was evidenced by a private controlled purchase, recorded on video and also by bill of purchase, listing the item sold and providing information on the seller. First instance court allowed all the evidence presented by the claimant and on 18 October announced its decision, awarding the requested compensation in full, as no objection was raised by the defendant concerning the amount thereof. This decision was supported by the 18th court of appeals in January 2022, despite the defendant’s arguments on procedural violations.

In March 2022 Ms. Mitrofanova filed a cassation plea with the Intellectual property Court, arguing, among other, that the claimant is incorporated in Latvia, which country is listed among unfriendly states in the Decree of the Russian Government No 430-r, and its actions constitute misuse of exclusive right, as the fishing wire is not listed in the trademark registration. The panel of judges, however, disagreed with the defendant, pointing out that the fishing wire is uniform with other goods in 28th class. Also the claimant’s actions to defend its exclusive right could not be regarded as misuse of this right and justify the infringement in question. No retorsion measures against Latvian companies were introduced in Russian legislation yet – and even if they were, they could not be applied retrospectively.

Therefore, the cassation court supported the acts of both first instance and appeal courts, dismissing the cassation plea. The second cassation plea, filed to the Supreme court of Russia, was returned on 13 September due to non-payment of court fees.

https://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/15a1097a-0d87-4431-96d9-1140fcfc4127

pat

Recent Posts

Tracking deadlines is an essential aspect of patent prosecution

Dear colleagues, we would like to inform you about the weekends and holidays in 2025…

1 неделя ago

October 24-26, 2024 | Patentica took part in AIPLA 2024 Annual Meeting

Maria Nilova and Nikolai Kovkov from Patentica recently participated in the AIPLA 2024 Annual Meeting…

4 недели ago

Patentica participated in the LES USA-Canada Annual Meeting | October 20-23, 2024

Maria Nilova and Nikolai Kovkov from Patentica recently took part in the LES USA-Canada Annual…

1 месяц ago

4,667 intellectual property infringements were identified in the EAEU in 2023

On October 9, a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Intellectual Property under the Board…

1 месяц ago

Rospatent’s clarifications on the Statute on Fees as amended

The Russian Patent and Trademark Office has issued clarifications regarding some typical questions on the…

2 месяца ago

Revocation of Patent RU 2421238 Related to Liraglutide Composition (Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd (IN) v. Novo Nordisk A/S (DK))

Patentica’s patent attorneys, Victor Lisovenko and Ksenia Emelianova have successfully represented Sun Pharmaceuticals in opposing…

2 месяца ago