Wildberries is refused TM registration for its Violet Pantone 254C by Rospatent

On September 15, 2022 the IP Court dismissed a lawsuit by the Russian giant online marketplace Wildberries OOO, and upheld Rospatent refusal to register Pantone 254C as a color trademark.

In May 2020, Wildberries filed an application for registration of violet “Pantone 254C” color as a trademark with regards to services in class 35. However, the application was refused, and Appeal filed with RosPatent Chamber for Patent Disputes yielded no positive results. Rospatent has found the appealed designation to be not sufficiently distinctive to satisfy the trademark criteria and concluded that a color as such cannot be an object of registration.

To overcome this decision, Wildberries lawyers filed a lawsuit against Rospatent in the IP Court, stressing its long use of Pantone 254C violet, which, as has been confirmed by the poll results, has become associated for most of customers with the Wildberries marketplace. Further, none of the other marketplaces currently acting in Russia is using the same color as their trade dress, such as office furnishing and other commercial merchandise.

TM 758874 https://new.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=RUTM&DocNumber=758874&TypeFile=html* all trademarks are property of their respective owners

The Court, however, has arrived at a conclusion that no distinctiveness for the color as such has been acquired through its use by Wildberries company. Most designations, actually used by the Claimant and referred to as the evidence, do have other elements, such as words, abbreviations and figures. Moreover, these designations mostly do not exactly have Pantone 254C color background. And there were quite a few other market players which use shades of violet for their Internet trade activities. The poll survey was conducted only after the application was filed and its results were, in fact, not so convincing to confirm that for majority of the customers the color was definitely associated with the Claimant. Therefore, the Court supported the Office and dismissed the lawsuit.

https://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/71e7b0bd-5821-47a5-a058-04ff7379b4fe

* all trademarks are property of their respective owners

pat

Recent Posts

A well-deserved trademark registration

Many trademarks may include non-protectable elements, which describe the type of goods these marks are…

3 недели ago

Intellectual Property in Mongolia

Mongolia stands out as a rapidly developing market, representing significant opportunities for both East Asian…

4 недели ago

Sega’s agreement with Russian businessman resolves trademark dispute

Sega Corporation, a well-known Japanese video game producer has entered in an agreement with a…

1 месяц ago

Patent fees in the Eurasian Patent Organization will be increased starting from 1 February 2025

The Eurasian Patent Organization will be raising the fees for several services starting from February…

1 месяц ago

At the end of 2024

At the end of 2024, as the year comes to a close, it is time…

2 месяца ago

The benefits of the Eurasian patent system: a single patent for multiple countries

In 1995, the Eurasian Patent Convention (EAPC) was established to create a unified patent space,…

3 месяца ago